Featured image: Simone Chellini/Airways

Trial Date Set in Government Felony Case Against Boeing

DALLAS — A federal judge in Texas has set a June 23 trial date for the U.S. government’s long-running conspiracy case against Boeing, alleging the aerospace giant deceived regulators about the 737 Max before two fatal crashes killed 346 people.

Trial Date After Rejected Plea Deal

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor issued the scheduling order Tuesday, setting the time frame for the proceedings in Fort Worth. The decision comes after months of negotiations between Boeing and the Justice Department following the judge’s rejection of a plea deal in December 2024.

Under the proposed settlement, Boeing would plead guilty to conspiring to defraud the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), thus averting a criminal trial. But O’Connor objected to the process for selecting an independent monitor to oversee Boeing’s compliance with the deferred prosecution agreement, requiring it to comply with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in the Justice Department.

Since then, both sides have received a series of extensions to resolve the matter, with an April 11 deadline to finalize a deal. The judge’s new order sweeps aside that deadline and propels the case directly ahead toward trial.

Government’s Case Against Boeing

The Justice Department claims that Boeing concealed the truth from FAA regulators about the 737 Max’s flight control system, specifically the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS). The latter factor led the FAA to sign off on minimal ground training for pilots, which saved airlines billions of dollars but put safety at risk.

The case grew in intensity following two deadly crashes of the 737 Max in 2018 and 2019 — one off the coast of Indonesia and one in Ethiopia. The crashes resulted in a global grounding of the plane and intensified scrutiny over Boeing’s safety culture.

While many families of victims in the crashes have urged prosecutors to bring criminal charges against former Boeing executives, prosecutors have said they do not have evidence that anyone at Boeing directly caused the accidents through deception. Instead, they argue that the conspiracy to commit fraud is the most serious charge they can viably pursue.

Boeing’s Defense, Rejected Plea Agreement

If the plea deal had been accepted, Boeing would have paid a fine of up to US$487.2 million, with credit for US$243.6 million already paid. It would also have been required to spend US$455 million on compliance and safety programs and undergo three years of outside supervision.

Even as he rejected the deal, Judge O’Connor did not oppose the proposed penalties. Instead, his concerns focused on the choice of an independent monitor, saying that Boeing and the Justice Department’s emphasis on DEI policies diminished public trust.

Boeing only agreed to the plea deal after the Justice Department agreed last year that the company had breached a deferred prosecution agreement from 2021, when it was shielded from criminal charges. That recalibration followed a mid-flight door plug failure of an Alaska Airlines 737 Max in January 2024, which renewed scrutiny of Boeing’s manufacturing quality and safety standards.

Boeing’s legal team had said it would contest the Justice Department’s conclusion that it had violated the 2021 agreement if the plea agreement was rejected. Judge O’Connor’s ruling in December helped Boeing’s argument by noting that it wasn’t clear exactly what actions would qualify as a violation.

Implications, Next Steps

With the trial now scheduled for June, Boeing will face increased scrutiny from regulators, lawmakers, and the public. The Justice Department declined to comment on the latest ruling, and a spokesman for Boeing said the company continued to have discussions with prosecutors.

“As the parties’ most recent filings make clear, Boeing and the Department of Justice are still engaged in good faith discussions for an appropriate resolution of this matter,” the company said in a statement.

The upcoming trial may further damage Boeing’s reputation, which has already been marred by safety issues and production problems. As the proceedings progress, the case will be a pivotal test of corporate accountability in the aviation sector.

Stay connected at every stop along your journey! Get any Saily mobile data plan at 5% off with the code AIRWAYSMAG5 + up to 5GB free!

Exploring Airline History Volume I

David H. Stringer, the History Editor for AIRWAYS Magazine, has chronicled the story of the commercial aviation industry with his airline history articles that have appeared in AIRWAYS over two decades. Here, for the first time, is a compilation of those articles.

Subjects A through C are presented in this first of three volumes. Covering topics such as the airlines of Alaska at the time of statehood and Canada's regional airlines of the 1960s, the individual histories of such carriers as Allegheny, American, Braniff, and Continental are also included in Volume One. Get your copy today!