‍DALLAS — Yesterday's diversion of American Airlines (AA) Flight 292 from New York to Delhi—escorted by Italian Eurofighter Typhoon jets following a bomb threat—highlights the role of military aircraft in mitigating airborne threats.

The incident, which occurred on Sunday, February 23, 2025, saw a Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner abruptly rerouted to Rome’s Fiumicino Airport (FCO) flanked and then followed by fighter jets, underscores a critical strategy employed to safeguard civilian flights during security crises. 

The following report examines the rationale, protocols, and operational imperatives behind deploying military escorts for commercial aircraft during bomb threats. It contextualizes historical precedents, tactical considerations, and the evolving nature of aerial security.

Evolution of Escort Protocols

Post-9/11 Paradigm Shifts

The use of fighter jets to escort commercial aircraft during security threats gained prominence after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States. Operation Noble Eagle, initiated in response to 9/11, institutionalized the practice of deploying military aircraft to monitor and protect civilian planes over domestic and international airspace. 

This protocol emerged from the recognition that hijacked commercial aircraft could be weaponized, as demonstrated tragically in 2001. The incident involving AA Flight 292 mirrors this approach, with Italian Air Force jets intercepting the aircraft to preempt potential hostile actions.

Cold War Precedents

The strategic use of fighter escorts dates back to World War II and the Korean War. P-51 Mustangs protected Allied bombers over Axis territories during the former, neutralizing enemy fighters that threatened mission success. 

Similarly, Cold War-era defection operations like Operation Moolah relied on escorts to safeguard high-value aircraft from interception. These historical examples established a template for modern escort missions, emphasizing deterrence, surveillance, and rapid response capabilities.

Recent Bomb Threat Precedents

On the week of October 19, 2024, a spate of bomb threat hoaxes targeting Indian carriers caused significant disruption and financial woes to the aviation industry in India.

While the exact motivation behind these hoaxes remained unclear, the pattern and frequency suggest a coordinated effort to disrupt Indian aviation operations. The scale and frequency of threats were as follows:

• Over 45 flights of Indian airlines received bomb threats since Friday October 18, 2024.
• Nearly 40 flights operated by Indian carriers received hoax bomb threats in the previous few days.
• On Saturday October 19, 2024, alone, over 20 flights of various Indian airlines received bomb threats.

The threats targeted multiple Indian carriers, including:

• Air India
• Vistara
• IndiGo
• Akasa Air
• SpiceJet
• Alliance Air
• Star Air

At the time, several flights were diverted or delayed due to these threats. Some airlines were forced to re-screen all their passengers, causing major inconvenience. In one instance, an Air India Express (IX) flight from Dubai to Jaipur had to land at Jaipur International Airport (JAI) following a threat.

The financial impact on airlines was substantial, with losses estimated in crores of rupees. For example, a Boeing 777 flight from Mumbai to New York had to dump over 100 tonnes of fuel due to a threat, costing the airline approximately Rs 1 crore in fuel alone.

The total cost of a single hoax threat can exceed Rs 3 crore, including unscheduled landings, passenger accommodations, and crew replacements.

While the the hoaxes targeting Indian airlines have no correlation to yesterday's Flight 292 diversion to Rome due to a "suspected" bomb threat, AA and Italian airport officials said the threat was not a credible one.

Tactical Objectives

Deterrence, Visual Signaling

A primary function of fighter escorts is to project a visible deterrent presence. 

The sight of military jets alongside a civilian aircraft serves multiple purposes: it reassures passengers and crew of governmental control, dissuades potential perpetrators from escalating threats, and signals to ground authorities that the situation is being monitored. 

In the case of Flight 292, social media footage of Eurofighters flanking the Boeing 787 provided tangible evidence of security measures.

Situational Awareness, Surveillance

Fighter pilots are trained to conduct close-range visual inspections of escorted aircraft. By maneuvering alongside the plane, they can assess external anomalies—such as structural damage, open cargo doors, or suspicious modifications—that might corroborate a bomb threat. 

‍

Italian pilots likely relayed real-time observations to ground command during the Rome diversion, enabling informed decisions about emergency landing protocols. This surveillance role is critical when onboard threats cannot be verified remotely.

Readiness to Neutralize Threats

Perhaps the most somber responsibility of escorting fighters is their authorization to neutralize a hijacked aircraft if it poses an imminent danger to populated areas. 

While no such action was required during the Flight 292 incident, military protocols in NATO member states—including Italy—mandate that pilots remain prepared to use lethal force to prevent a repeat of 9/11-style attacks. 

This contingency, though rare, underscores the gravity of escort missions and their alignment with national security doctrines.

Operational Protocols, Interagency Coordination

Rapid Response, Scramble Procedures

Modern escort operations rely on stringent scramble protocols. When air traffic controllers or governmental agencies identify a potential threat, nearby fighter wings are alerted to intercept the target aircraft. 

The Italian Air Force’s response to Flight 292 came within minutes of the bomb threat report; Eurofighters were airborne, establishing contact with the Boeing 787 over the Mediterranean. 

This rapid deployment hinges on pre-positioned assets, real-time intelligence sharing, and streamlined communication between civilian and military authorities.

Integration with Civil Aviation Systems

Effective escort missions require seamless coordination between commercial pilots, air traffic control (ATC), and military units. During the Flight 292 diversion, the cockpit crew communicated with Italian authorities and the AA security team, ensuring alignment on landing procedures and threat assessments. 

International agreements, such as NATO’s Air Policing commitments, facilitate this integration by standardizing cross-border response mechanisms for airborne emergencies.

Post-Landing Security Measures

Upon landing, escorted aircraft undergo rigorous security inspections. In Rome, law enforcement personnel boarded Flight 292 to conduct a sweep for explosives, which took approximately three hours. 

While such delays inconvenience passengers, they are necessary for risk mitigation. Post-9/11 enhancements in explosive detection technology, including K-9 units and portable scanners, enable thorough yet efficient screenings.

Psychological, Logistical Considerations

Passenger, Crew Management

Managing human factors during bomb threats is a critical challenge. On Flight 292, cabin crew instructed passengers to remain seated and avoid moving through the cabin while fighters escorted the plane—a protocol designed to prevent panic and maintain order. 

Airline staff training programs now emphasize crisis communication techniques, including clear, calm instructions during security emergencies.

Media, Public Perception

The proliferation of smartphone cameras and social media has transformed public perception of escort missions. Viral footage of military jets accompanying civilian planes can amplify anxiety but also demonstrate governmental competence. 

After the Flight 292 incident, AA's timely apologies and transparency in updates helped mitigate reputational damage, illustrating the importance of coordinated public relations strategies.

Comparative Analysis of International Escort Policies

NATO Member States

NATO countries adhere to standardized escort protocols, including using multinational fighter assets for cross-border threats. Italy’s deployment of Eurofighters under the banner of collective security reflects this framework. 

By contrast, non-NATO nations may lack interoperable systems, potentially delaying response times during international flights.

Asian, Middle Eastern Approaches

Countries like India, the intended destination of Flight 292, have intensified escort policies following recent hoax bomb threats. In 2024, Indian authorities mandated fighter jet escorts for all flights receiving threat alerts, regardless of credibility. 

This contrasts with the U.S. approach, prioritizing threat verification before scrambling fighters—a distinction rooted in resource allocation and risk tolerance.

Technological Advancements in Escort Operations

Drone Escorts, Autonomous Systems

Emerging technologies promise to augment traditional fighter escorts. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with high-resolution cameras and threat-detection algorithms could provide persistent surveillance without risking pilot lives. 

However, regulatory and ethical hurdles—such as airspace integration and decision-making autonomy—remain significant barriers to widespread adoption8.

Cybersecurity, Threat Detection

Modern bomb threats increasingly involve cyber components, such as hoax messages relayed via compromised airline communication systems. In response, agencies like the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) are investing in AI-driven threat detection platforms capable of distinguishing credible risks from false alarms9. 

These systems could reduce unnecessary escort deployments, optimizing resource allocation.

Balancing Security, Operational Realities

It is also important to note that the last confirmed real bomb threat in commercial aviation that resulted in a catastrophic incident was the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 on December 21, 1988. This attack, known as the Lockerbie bombing, caused the plane to crash over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing all 259 people on board and 11 people on the ground.

Aviation Security has come a long way since the 80s; today's multi-layered approach to AVSEC significantly reduces the risk and has proven effective in preventing such attacks in the last four decades. Still, the diversion of AA Flight 292 to Rome highlights the line between aviation security and operational practicality.

While military escorts impose financial and logistical burdens—Eurofighter Typhoons cost approximately US$70,000 per hour to operate—their role in safeguarding human lives and national infrastructure remains indispensable. 

Future developments, including drone integration and enhanced AI analytics, may refine escort protocols, but the core principles of deterrence, surveillance, and readiness are here to stay.

Stay connected at every stop along your journey! Get any Saily mobile data plan at 5% off with the code AIRWAYSMAG5 + up to 5GB free!